Abstract
More than 30% of children admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) are malnourished and are at risk to develop new or worsened malnutrition during their hospitalization. Delivery of enteral nutrition (EN) during hospitalization is associated with lower mortality and morbidity rates. Barriers to adequate delivery of EN include hemodynamic instability, feeding interruptions, feeding intolerance and lack of standardized feeding protocols. Gastrointestinal (GI) dysmotility during critical illness increases the risk of feeding intolerance due to increased influence of the Sympathetic Nervous System. Critically ill children have traditionally been fed via continuous gastric infusion under the assumption that slow, continuous feeding decreases the risk of intolerance and aspiration. However, GI physiology suggests GI motility is enhanced when the gut is rested between feedings. The purpose of this comparative effectiveness study was to evaluate two enteral feeding delivery modes, continuous versus bolus, on the attainment of prescribed caloric and protein nutritional goals and the frequency and type of feeding intolerance events in mechanically ventilated infants and children 1 month corrected gestation age through 12 years of age.
Sigma Membership
Delta Omega
Type
Dissertation
Format Type
Text-based Document
Study Design/Type
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Approach
Pilot/Exploratory Study
Keywords:
Pediatric Patients, Tube Feeding, Enteral Feeding Methods
Advisor
Elaine Fisher
Degree
PhD
Degree Grantor
The University of Akron
Degree Year
2014
Recommended Citation
Brown, Ann-Marie, "A comparison of two gastric feeding approaches in mechanically ventilated pediatric patients" (2019). Dissertations. 472.
https://www.sigmarepository.org/dissertations/472
Rights Holder
All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.
All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.
All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.
Review Type
None: Degree-based Submission
Acquisition
Proxy-submission
Date of Issue
2019-06-10
Full Text of Presentation
wf_yes
Description
This dissertation has also been disseminated through the ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. Dissertation/thesis number: 3671063; ProQuest document ID: 1645957733. The author still retains copyright.