Abstract
Essential learning occurs during the debriefing phase of simulation-based learning experiences. Despite this knowledge, evidence regarding the most effective debriefing method is insufficient. The primary purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of two debriefing frameworks, Promoting Excellence and Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS) and Structured and Supported Debriefing Model using Gather, Analyze, Summarize (GAS) on student performance during simulation. This pilot study used a two group, pretest-posttest, experimental design with group randomization.
Sigma Membership
Mu Beta
Type
Dissertation
Format Type
Text-based Document
Study Design/Type
Pretest-Posttest
Research Approach
Other
Keywords:
Simulation Learning, Nursing Students, Nursing Education, Simulated Clinical Experiences
Advisor
Barbara Aronson
Second Advisor
Andrea Adimando
Third Advisor
David Rodgers
Degree
Doctoral-Other
Degree Grantor
Southern Connecticut State University
Degree Year
2021
Recommended Citation
Prendergast, Krista M., "Comparing the effects of two debriefing frameworks; Promoting excellence and reflective learning in simulation (PEARLS) framework and structured and supported debriefing model (GAS) framework" (2022). Dissertations. 475.
https://www.sigmarepository.org/dissertations/475
Rights Holder
All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.
All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.
All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.
Review Type
None: Degree-based Submission
Acquisition
Proxy-submission
Date of Issue
2022-01-13
Full Text of Presentation
wf_yes
Description
This dissertation has also been disseminated through the ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. Dissertation/thesis number: 28721386; ProQuest document ID: 2585956646. The author still retains copyright.