Abstract
Nurse executives are challenged to provide adequate nurse staffing to prevent adverse patient outcomes, promote patient satisfaction and enhance nurses' job satisfaction. Historically, nurse staffing strategies have involved the use of patient classification systems, the use of time studies to predict staffing numbers and the best guesses of the nurse administrators. Collective bargaining units moved to include staffing ceilings or nurse-to-patient ratios to address staffing needs in hospitals. In 1999, the state of California signed AB394 into law requiring the implementation of mandated minimum nurse-to-patient ratios. The California Department of Health Services estimated that the mandated nurse-to-patient ratios would cost California hospitals $956 million annually after implementation given adequate recruiting sources (CHA, 2004). While this estimate was made prior to the known fiscal impact of the ratios, no study has been published addressing the actual costs differences to the hospitals of the mandated nurse-to-patient ratios that were implemented in 2004. As other states consider introducing legislation to implement the staffing ratios as California has done, the impact of these costs should be revealed. The aim of this study was to examine the impact on nursing costs expressed as a percentage of hospital operating costs from before the staffing ratios in California were implemented (2002) and after the staffing ratios were implemented (2006).
Sigma Membership
Beta Delta at-Large
Type
Dissertation
Format Type
Text-based Document
Study Design/Type
Other
Research Approach
Quantitative Research
Keywords:
Nurse Executives, Staffing Strategies, Staffing Costs
Advisor
Thad Wilson
Degree
PhD
Degree Grantor
University of Missouri, Kansas City
Degree Year
2009
Recommended Citation
Wells, Shelly C., "A comparison of the nursing costs associated with the implementation of the mandated nurse-to-patient ratios in California" (2019). Dissertations. 734.
https://www.sigmarepository.org/dissertations/734
Rights Holder
All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.
All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.
All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.
Review Type
None: Degree-based Submission
Acquisition
Proxy-submission
Date of Issue
2019-09-25
Full Text of Presentation
wf_yes
Description
This dissertation has also been disseminated through the ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. Dissertation/thesis number: 3394768; ProQuest document ID: 304942940. The author still retains copyright.