Other Titles

Rising Star Poster/Presentation

Abstract

Introduction: Racial and economic cancer treatment disparities pose a major public health challenge. Pre-existing psychosocial stressors and overall "weathering" or allostatic load are often more profound among patients of color and those from areas of high deprivation and may impact cancer outcomes.

Purpose: This study characterized baseline allostatic load, lifetime stress, perceived discrimination, financial toxicity, quality of life, distress, symptom burden, and resilience, compared by race and area deprivation.

Methods: This analysis was drawn from the prospective, observational ALLEGIANT (Allostasis, Cellular Aging, and Cancer Outcomes) study. Patients initiating cancer therapy were recruited from cancer clinics in Western Pennsylvania. Measures included financial toxicity (COST), quality of life (FACT-G), distress (Distress Thermometer), perceived discrimination (Lifetime Discrimination Scale), perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale), symptom burden (Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale), resilience (Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale), and allostatic load. Allostatic load (0-8) was calculated as a composite of blood pressure, body mass index, waist circumference, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, hemoglobin A1c, and C-reactive protein. Baseline characteristics were compared by race (Black/White self-report) and area deprivation index (calculated from residential address) using descriptive, comparative, and correlational statistics.

Results: Fifty-seven patients were recruited from Western Pennsylvania oncology clinics. Mean allostatic load was 3.30 (SD 1.52), with no significant differences by race or ADI. There was a significant correlation between higher allostatic load and worse financial toxicity (r = −0.275, p < 0.05). Higher area deprivation was significantly associated with worse financial toxicity (r = −0.304, p < 0.05), higher psychological stress, and lower health literacy (r = −0.282, p < 0.05).

Discussion: All adults initiating chemotherapy exhibited moderate physiological weathering, as reflected in allostatic load. Further work needs to characterize the impact of allostatic load on cancer outcomes. These findings underscore the need for early, systematic screening for financial and psychosocial stressors in oncology settings.

Notes

References:

Chan, R. J., Gordon, L. G., Tan, C. J., Chan, A., Bradford, N. K., Yates, P., & Miaskowski, C. (2019). Relationships between financial toxicity and symptom burden in cancer survivors: a systematic review. Journal of pain and symptom management, 57(3), 646-660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.12.003

de Alcantara Nogueira, L., Lenhani, B. E., Tomim, D. H., & Kalinke, L. P. (2020). Financial toxicity. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention: APJCP, 21(2), 289. https://doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.2.289

Doan, S. N. (2021). Allostatic load: Developmental and conceptual considerations in a multisystem physiological indicator of chronic stress exposure. Developmental psychobiology, 63(5), 825-836.

Jackson, C. L., Dagher, R. K., Byun, J. S., Farhat, T., & Gardner, K. L. (2021). Getting under the skin: Pathways and processes that link social and biological determinants of disease. In The science of health disparities research (pp. 13–38). Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health.

Kind, A. J., & Buckingham, W. R. (2018). Making neighborhood-disadvantage metrics accessible—the neighborhood atlas. The New England journal of medicine, 378(26), 2456. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1802313

Kunhiraman, H. H., Shah, V., Nahle, T., Trinh, N., Lempner, A., Singh, S., ... & Program, C. O. (2025). Social Determinants of Health in Cardio Oncology, from Evidence To Action: Translating Concepts into Clinical Practice Through Implementation Science. Current treatment options in oncology, 1-14.

McDowell, I. (2023). Biological pathways linking social determinants to health. In Understanding health determinants: Explanatory theories for social epidemiology (pp. 161–203). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19129-9_7

McEwen, B. S., & Wingfield, J. C. (2003). The concept of allostasis in biology and biomedicine. Hormones and Behavior, 43(1), 2-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0018-506X(02)00024-7

Podder, V., Sarfraz, Z., Qidwai, K. A., Maharaj, A., Ranjan, T., Aulakh, S., & Ahluwalia, M. S. (2025). Gaps in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcomes Among Patients with Brain Tumors in the United States: A State-of-the-Art Review. Cancers, 17(24), 3982. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17243982

Rosenzweig, M. Q., Nugent, B., & McGuire, M. (2023). Impact of Race and Area Deprivation on Triple-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer Outcomes. In Oncology Nursing Forum (Vol. 50, No. 4). DOI 10.1188/23.ONF.449-457

Rosenzweig, M. Q., Wiehagen, T., Brufsky, A., & Arnold, R. (2009). Challenges of illness in metastatic breast cancer: A low-income African American perspective. Palliative & Supportive Care, 7(2), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951509000192

Rosenzweig, M., Belcher, S. M., Braithwaite, L. E., Cuaron, L., Fischer-Cartlidge, E., Lally, R. M., & Anderson, A. (2024). Research Priorities of the Oncology Nursing Society: 2024–2027. In Oncology nursing forum (Vol. 51, No. 6, p. 502).

Sedrak, M. S., Sun, C. L., Ji, J., Cohen, H. J., Gross, C. P., Tew, W. P., Muss, H. B. (2023). Low-Intensity Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer in Older Women: Results from the Prospective Multicenter HOPE Trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 41(2), 316-326. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.22.01440

Vardell, V. A., Ose, J., Rets, A. V., Tantravahi, S. K., & Patel, A. B. (2024). Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia and atypical chronic myeloid leukemia: a national analysis. Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia, 24(12), 843-851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2024.07.013

Zavala, V. A., Bracci, P. M., Carethers, J. M., Carvajal-Carmona, L., Coggins, N. B., Cruz-Correa, M. R., & Fejerman, L. (2021). Cancer health disparities in racial/ethnic minorities in the United States. British Journal of Cancer, 124(2), 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-01038-6

Description

This study aims to characterize baseline physiological stress and examine how it affects outcomes in patients with cancer.

Author Details

Campbell Speakman, Margaret Quinn Rosenzweig, PhD, Emmanuel Komladzah University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA

Sigma Membership

Non-member

Type

Poster

Format Type

Text-based Document

Study Design/Type

Secondary Analysis

Research Approach

Quantitative Research

Keywords:

Psychological Stress, Physiological Stress, Cancer Patients, Cancer Treatment, Cancer Chemotherapy

Conference Name

37th International Nursing Research Congress

Conference Host

Sigma Theta Tau International

Conference Location

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Conference Year

2026

Rights Holder

All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record. All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository. All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.

Review Type

Invited Presentation

Acquisition

Proxy-submission

Date of Issue

2026-09-17

Click on the above link to access the poster.

Share

COinS
 

Baseline Psychosocial Stress and Allostatic Load in Patients Initiating Cancer Therapy

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Introduction: Racial and economic cancer treatment disparities pose a major public health challenge. Pre-existing psychosocial stressors and overall "weathering" or allostatic load are often more profound among patients of color and those from areas of high deprivation and may impact cancer outcomes.

Purpose: This study characterized baseline allostatic load, lifetime stress, perceived discrimination, financial toxicity, quality of life, distress, symptom burden, and resilience, compared by race and area deprivation.

Methods: This analysis was drawn from the prospective, observational ALLEGIANT (Allostasis, Cellular Aging, and Cancer Outcomes) study. Patients initiating cancer therapy were recruited from cancer clinics in Western Pennsylvania. Measures included financial toxicity (COST), quality of life (FACT-G), distress (Distress Thermometer), perceived discrimination (Lifetime Discrimination Scale), perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale), symptom burden (Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale), resilience (Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale), and allostatic load. Allostatic load (0-8) was calculated as a composite of blood pressure, body mass index, waist circumference, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, hemoglobin A1c, and C-reactive protein. Baseline characteristics were compared by race (Black/White self-report) and area deprivation index (calculated from residential address) using descriptive, comparative, and correlational statistics.

Results: Fifty-seven patients were recruited from Western Pennsylvania oncology clinics. Mean allostatic load was 3.30 (SD 1.52), with no significant differences by race or ADI. There was a significant correlation between higher allostatic load and worse financial toxicity (r = −0.275, p < 0.05). Higher area deprivation was significantly associated with worse financial toxicity (r = −0.304, p < 0.05), higher psychological stress, and lower health literacy (r = −0.282, p < 0.05).

Discussion: All adults initiating chemotherapy exhibited moderate physiological weathering, as reflected in allostatic load. Further work needs to characterize the impact of allostatic load on cancer outcomes. These findings underscore the need for early, systematic screening for financial and psychosocial stressors in oncology settings.