Other Titles

Does the Algorithm Care? Preliminary Findings from a Randomized Study of AI Communication Tone and Perceived Caring Behaviors [Poster Title]

Abstract

As AI tools increasingly mediate health communication, questions arise about whether users perceive these systems as capable of relational behaviors such as caring, empathy, or emotional support. Existing scholarship emphasizes accuracy and safety, yet little is known about how the emotional tone of AI communication, caring versus neutral, shapes user perceptions across cultural contexts.

This research-in-progress pilot examines how college students in the United States and Kenya interpret caring-tone and neutral-tone AI responses in health scenarios. Using a 2 (Tone: Caring vs. Neutral) × 2 (Health Context: Mental vs. Physical) × 2 (Site: U.S. vs. Kenya) mixed factorial vignette design, the study will recruit 200 undergraduate students (100 per site). Participants will be randomly assigned to AI-generated vignettes and will rate each interaction on trust, empathy, emotional comfort, and authenticity.

We hypothesize that caring-tone responses will yield higher ratings across relational dimensions and that cultural context will moderate these effects. Data will be collected via Qualtrics and analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA to test main and interaction effects.

Findings, available by the time of presentation, will provide early insight into how tone, culture, and health context influence perceptions of AI’s relational roles. The study lays foundational evidence for developing culturally responsive, ethically grounded AI tools in health communication and informs future federally funded research examining care ethics in AI design.

Notes

References:

Chandra, A., Senthilvel, K., Anjum, R., Uchegbu, I., Smith, L. J., Beaumont, H., Punjabi, R., Begum, S., & Marshall, C. R. (2025). Cultural variation in trust and acceptability of artificial intelligence diagnostics for dementia. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 104(3), 653–655.

De Togni, G., Erikainen, S., Chan, S., & Cunningham-Burley, S. (2021). What makes AI 'intelligent' and 'caring'? Exploring affect and relationality across three sites of intelligence and care. Soc Sci Med, 277, 113874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113874

Folk, D. P., Wu, C., & Heine, S. J. (2025). Cultural variation in attitudes toward social chatbots. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 56(3), 219–239.

Description

This pilot study examines how university students in Kenya and the United States perceive caring versus neutral AI communication in mental and physical health scenarios. Using vignette-based experiments, it explores how tone and cultural context shape trust, empathy, emotional comfort, and authenticity in AI-mediated interactions.

Author Details

Rachel W. Kimani, DNP; Rose Maina, PhD

Sigma Membership

Non-member

Type

Poster

Format Type

Text-based Document

Study Design/Type

Other

Research Approach

Pilot/Exploratory Study

Keywords:

Ethics, Cultural Exchange Programs or Study Abroad, Competence, College Students, Student Attitudes, Cognitive Bias, Artificial Intelligence, Caring

Conference Name

37th International Nursing Research Congress

Conference Host

Sigma Theta Tau International

Conference Location

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Conference Year

2026

Rights Holder

All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record. All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository. All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.

Review Type

Abstract Review Only: Reviewed by Event Host

Acquisition

Publisher-submission

Date of Issue

2026-09-24

Click on the above link to access the poster.

Share

COinS
 

Perceptions of AI Caring Behaviors Among University Students in Kenya and the United States

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

As AI tools increasingly mediate health communication, questions arise about whether users perceive these systems as capable of relational behaviors such as caring, empathy, or emotional support. Existing scholarship emphasizes accuracy and safety, yet little is known about how the emotional tone of AI communication, caring versus neutral, shapes user perceptions across cultural contexts.

This research-in-progress pilot examines how college students in the United States and Kenya interpret caring-tone and neutral-tone AI responses in health scenarios. Using a 2 (Tone: Caring vs. Neutral) × 2 (Health Context: Mental vs. Physical) × 2 (Site: U.S. vs. Kenya) mixed factorial vignette design, the study will recruit 200 undergraduate students (100 per site). Participants will be randomly assigned to AI-generated vignettes and will rate each interaction on trust, empathy, emotional comfort, and authenticity.

We hypothesize that caring-tone responses will yield higher ratings across relational dimensions and that cultural context will moderate these effects. Data will be collected via Qualtrics and analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA to test main and interaction effects.

Findings, available by the time of presentation, will provide early insight into how tone, culture, and health context influence perceptions of AI’s relational roles. The study lays foundational evidence for developing culturally responsive, ethically grounded AI tools in health communication and informs future federally funded research examining care ethics in AI design.