Abstract

Purpose. The 28-item Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory (Brief COPE) is a widely used instrument assessing coping strategies among adults, but its reported factor structure has ranged from 2 to 15 factors across populations (Solberg et al., 2022), raising concerns about structural stability. Only one study has applied item response theory (IRT) to examine item-level performance in cancer patients and caregivers (Baumstarck et al., 2017). Thus, this study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Brief COPE among low-income parents using factor analysis and IRT.

Methods. We analyzed baseline data from three clinical trials conducted between 2021 and 2024. Participants were parents of preschoolers enrolled in Head Start programs in the Midwestern U.S. Parents completed an online Qualtrics survey measuring demographics and coping strategies.

Results. The sample included 348 parents (Mage=30.89 years), randomly divided into two subsamples: one for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and the other for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). EFA suggested a four-factor structure after removing four items due to high inter-item correlations or cross-loadings: adaptive coping, support coping, avoidant coping, and religious coping. CFA demonstrated good fit: CFI=0.92, TLI=0.91, RMSEA=0.06 (90% CI: 0.05–0.07), and SRMR=0.08. Internal consistency was strong (α=0.88, 0.81, 0.86, 0.81). Most items showed adequate difficulty and discrimination, while several appeared redundant. Information curves were unimodal. Response option “3” was under-endorsed across multiple items, and several items had sparsely used options, indicating the need to collapse or revise categories.

Conclusions. Findings provide robust evidence for a reliable four-factor, 24-item Brief COPE in low-income parents. Item- and option-level performance varies, suggesting targeted item consolidation and response-option refinement could further improve the scale’s psychometric robustness. Future efforts should implement these revisions and cross-validate the refined scale in independent samples.

Notes

Presenter notes available in attached slide deck. To see the notes in Adobe Acrobat, go to Tools > Comment or look at your Layers Panel. If the notes were saved as comments or layers, you can toggle them visible. 

References:

Baumstarck, K., et al. (2017). Assessment of coping: a new french four-factor structure of the brief COPE inventory. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 15(1), 8.

Solberg, M. A., et al. (2022). The factor structure of the Brief COPE: A systematic review. West J Nurs Res, 44(6), 612-627.

Description

This study examined the factor structure and item performance of the 28-item Brief COPE among 348 low-income parents. Results support a four-factor structure with good internal consistency reliability: adaptive coping, support coping, avoidant coping, and religious coping, though revisions at the item and response-option levels may be warranted.

Author Details

 Jiying Ling, PhD, MS, RN, FAAN; Dongjuan Xu, PhD, MS, RN; Yingcen Xie, MS; Wen Liu, PhD, RN, FGSA, FAAN

Sigma Membership

Alpha Psi

Lead Author Affiliation

Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA

Type

Presentation

Format Type

Text-based Document

Study Design/Type

Other

Research Approach

Other

Keywords:

Instrument and Tool Development, Public and Community Health, Stress and Coping, Parents--Psychosocial Factors

Conference Name

37th International Nursing Research Congress

Conference Host

Sigma Theta Tau International

Conference Location

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Conference Year

2026

Rights Holder

All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record. All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository. All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.

Review Type

Abstract Review Only: Reviewed by Event Host

Acquisition

Proxy-submission

Date of Issue

2026-07-24

Funder

National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health

Second Funder

National Institute of Nursing Research

Third Funder

Michigan Health Endowment Fund

Click above link to access the slide deck.

Share

COinS
 

Psychometric Evaluation of the 28-Item Brief COPE Scale Among Low-Income Parents

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Purpose. The 28-item Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory (Brief COPE) is a widely used instrument assessing coping strategies among adults, but its reported factor structure has ranged from 2 to 15 factors across populations (Solberg et al., 2022), raising concerns about structural stability. Only one study has applied item response theory (IRT) to examine item-level performance in cancer patients and caregivers (Baumstarck et al., 2017). Thus, this study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Brief COPE among low-income parents using factor analysis and IRT.

Methods. We analyzed baseline data from three clinical trials conducted between 2021 and 2024. Participants were parents of preschoolers enrolled in Head Start programs in the Midwestern U.S. Parents completed an online Qualtrics survey measuring demographics and coping strategies.

Results. The sample included 348 parents (Mage=30.89 years), randomly divided into two subsamples: one for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and the other for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). EFA suggested a four-factor structure after removing four items due to high inter-item correlations or cross-loadings: adaptive coping, support coping, avoidant coping, and religious coping. CFA demonstrated good fit: CFI=0.92, TLI=0.91, RMSEA=0.06 (90% CI: 0.05–0.07), and SRMR=0.08. Internal consistency was strong (α=0.88, 0.81, 0.86, 0.81). Most items showed adequate difficulty and discrimination, while several appeared redundant. Information curves were unimodal. Response option “3” was under-endorsed across multiple items, and several items had sparsely used options, indicating the need to collapse or revise categories.

Conclusions. Findings provide robust evidence for a reliable four-factor, 24-item Brief COPE in low-income parents. Item- and option-level performance varies, suggesting targeted item consolidation and response-option refinement could further improve the scale’s psychometric robustness. Future efforts should implement these revisions and cross-validate the refined scale in independent samples.