Other Titles

Optimizing Heart Failure Clinic Referrals Using a Heart Failure Readmission Risk Score [Title Slide]

Abstract

Background: Heart failure (HF) readmissions result in patients’ poor quality of life, depleted healthcare resources, reduced quality scores, and poor payor reimbursement, affecting healthcare systems’ financial stability. This is alleviated by referral to the HF Clinic. The project aims to compare HF Clinic referral rates after risk-assessing admitted HF patients with the European Collaboration on Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (ELAN-HF) risk tool to referral rates before the intervention. A goal is to utilize the ELAN-HF risk stratification tool to identify patients with the highest risk of readmission, refer them to the nurse-led HF Clinic, and provide self-care education and clinical monitoring to reduce HF readmissions at the project site.

Methods: Decompensated, 18 and older HF patients with an elevated NT pro-BNP (N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide) value, on a cardiac stepdown unit. The Knowledge to Action translational science theory supported project implementation.

Results: Pre-intervention, 27 HF patients were referred to the HF clinic, with zero patients receiving a risk assessment. Post-intervention, 55 patients were referred to the HF Clinic. Nineteen patients were assessed with the ELAN-HF tool. Six scored high for readmission risk and were referred to the HF Clinic. Per inferential statistics, the intervention was not statistically significant, with p = .083.

Conclusion: The ELAN-HF risk assessment tool identified patients at high risk for HF readmission. The intervention did not statistically impact referral rates to the HF clinic. The risk assessment highlighted the importance of analyzing the NT-proBNP value before discharge and the relative change in the lab value throughout the admission. The analysis of this quantitative lab value reveals whether the patient’s HF status has improved mildly or significantly. The higher the ELAN-HF risk score, the higher the risk of readmission. Identifying patients at greatest risk for readmission provides clarity on which patients should receive the greatest clinical resources to avoid readmission. Tasking the nursing staff with the risk scoring augmented their understanding of HF, and enhanced clinical collaboration with the interdisciplinary team. The nursing staff significantly increased their knowledge of HF care resources available to patients following a HF admission.

Notes

References:

1. Kadoglou, N. P. E., Parissis, J., Karavidas, A., Kanonidis, I., & Trivella, M. (2022). Assessment of acute heart failure prognosis: The promising role of prognostic models and biomarkers. Heart Failure Reviews, 27(2), 655–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-021-10122-9

2. Savarese, G., Becher, P. M., Lund, L. H., Seferovic, P., Rosano, G. M., & Coats, A. J. (2023). Global burden of heart failure: A comprehensive and updated review of epidemiology. Cardiovascular Research, 118(17), 3272–3287. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvac013

3. Shiraishi, Y., Kawana, M., Nakata, J., Sato, N., Fukuda, K., & Kohsaka, S. (2021). Time sensitive approach in the management of acute heart failure. ESC Heart Failure, 8(1), 204-221. https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13139

4. Son, Y.-J., Choi, J., & Lee, H.-J. (2020). Effectiveness of nurse-led heart failure self-care education on health outcomes of heart failure patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), 6559-. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186559

5. Vinck T., Deneer R., Verstappen C., Kok, W., Salah K., Scharnhorst V. (2022). Validation of the ELAN-HF Score and self-care behaviour on the nurse-led heart failure clinic after admission for heart failure. BMC Nursing, 21(1), 1–158. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-00914-1

Description

HF readmissions are a key performance indicator that institutions find challenging and a global healthcare quality and financial concern. HF patients are not usually assessed for HF readmission risk at discharge. This creates an intriguing opportunity to evaluate patients for a HF clinic referral based on quantitative HF lab values. A referral to a nurse-led HF clinic for increased clinical monitoring, education on self-care and disease management, can reduce HF readmissions.

Author Details

Marianne R. Borkosky DNP, MHA, APRN, NP-C AACC

Sigma Membership

Phi Pi

Type

Presentation

Format Type

Text-based Document

Study Design/Type

Other

Research Approach

Other

Keywords:

Heart Failure, Readmission, Interprofessional Relations, Collaboration, Referral and Consultation

Conference Name

37th International Nursing Research Congress

Conference Host

Sigma Theta Tau International

Conference Location

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Conference Year

2026

Rights Holder

All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record. All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository. All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.

Review Type

Abstract Review Only: Reviewed by Event Host

Acquisition

Proxy-submission

Date of Issue

2026-07-24

Click above link to access the slide deck.

Share

COinS
 

Optimizing Nurse-Led Heart Failure Clinic Referrals Using a Heart Failure Readmission Risk Score

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Background: Heart failure (HF) readmissions result in patients’ poor quality of life, depleted healthcare resources, reduced quality scores, and poor payor reimbursement, affecting healthcare systems’ financial stability. This is alleviated by referral to the HF Clinic. The project aims to compare HF Clinic referral rates after risk-assessing admitted HF patients with the European Collaboration on Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (ELAN-HF) risk tool to referral rates before the intervention. A goal is to utilize the ELAN-HF risk stratification tool to identify patients with the highest risk of readmission, refer them to the nurse-led HF Clinic, and provide self-care education and clinical monitoring to reduce HF readmissions at the project site.

Methods: Decompensated, 18 and older HF patients with an elevated NT pro-BNP (N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide) value, on a cardiac stepdown unit. The Knowledge to Action translational science theory supported project implementation.

Results: Pre-intervention, 27 HF patients were referred to the HF clinic, with zero patients receiving a risk assessment. Post-intervention, 55 patients were referred to the HF Clinic. Nineteen patients were assessed with the ELAN-HF tool. Six scored high for readmission risk and were referred to the HF Clinic. Per inferential statistics, the intervention was not statistically significant, with p = .083.

Conclusion: The ELAN-HF risk assessment tool identified patients at high risk for HF readmission. The intervention did not statistically impact referral rates to the HF clinic. The risk assessment highlighted the importance of analyzing the NT-proBNP value before discharge and the relative change in the lab value throughout the admission. The analysis of this quantitative lab value reveals whether the patient’s HF status has improved mildly or significantly. The higher the ELAN-HF risk score, the higher the risk of readmission. Identifying patients at greatest risk for readmission provides clarity on which patients should receive the greatest clinical resources to avoid readmission. Tasking the nursing staff with the risk scoring augmented their understanding of HF, and enhanced clinical collaboration with the interdisciplinary team. The nursing staff significantly increased their knowledge of HF care resources available to patients following a HF admission.