Other Titles

Rising Star Poster/Presentation - Rapid Presentation Round

Abstract

Background: Increased age is a significant risk factor for hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPI) due to increased morbidities, decreased mobility, reduced nutrition, sensory impairments, reduced circulation, incontinence, and decreased immunity.

Purpose: Determine if focused education related to the Braden Scale (BS), pressure injuries (PI), and pressure injury prevention (PIP) will increase bedside staff knowledge of PI prevention and decrease HAPI incidence over three months.

Method: Pre/post-test design - Pre-intervention questionnaire, Educational Intervention, and Post-intervention questionnaire

Setting: 28-bed Orthopedic-Spinal Surgical Unit

Sample: Up to 38 nurses (RNs), four nursing supervisors, one director, and 14 patient care technicians (PCTs). Inclusion criteria: All full-time/part-time RNs, PCTs, supervisors, and the unit director working on an ortho-surgical unit who can read and write English and agree to participate. Patient sample includes any patients who experience a HAPI during the pre-intervention (3-month period) and post-intervention comparison 3-month period.

Instruments: Pressure Injury Knowledge Assessment Tool (PUKAT 2.0) to assess staff knowledge of PIs. Demographic questionnaire including age, gender, ethnicity, role, years of experience, and education level. A post-assessment questionnaire included an open-ended qualitative survey asking respondents to provide feedback about the educational intervention.

Intervention: Two weeks after completion of the pre-PUKAT 2.0, we delivered focused education based on the results of the pre-PUKAT via a rolling education cart, along with an illustrated informative PI booklet. Education was provided twice daily to reach the day and night shift staff. Two weeks post-educational intervention, the same PUKAT 2.0 was delivered to determine if staff education improved PI knowledge. HAPI incidence was also measured pre and post-intervention to assess for patient impact.

Data Analysis: Pre/post-knowledge assessment tests were analyzed using paired samples t-test. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze demographic data. HAPI incidence on the target unit will be compared in the same date ranges pre/post-educational intervention – 10/1/22 – 12/31/22 compared with 10/1/23 – 12/31/23.

Notes

References:
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2016). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) quality indicators (QIs) fact sheet: Patient safety and adverse events composite (modified version PSI 90). AHRQ. https://qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/News/PSI90_Factsheet_FAQ_v1.pdf

Al-Otaibi, Y., Al-Nowaiser, N., and Rahman, A. (2019). Reducing hospital-acquired pressure injuries. BMJ Open Quality, 8(1), e000464. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000464

Aloweni, F., Ang, S., Fook-Chong, S., Agus, N., Yong, P., Goh, M., Tucker-Kellogg, L, and Soh, R. (2019). A prediction tool for hospital-acquired pressure ulcers among surgical patients: Surgical pressure ulcer risk score. International Wound Journal, 16(1), 164-175. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13007

Araújo, T.M., Araújo, M.F.M., Barros, L.M., Oliveria, F.J.G., da Silva, L.A., and Caetano, J.A. (2019). Educational intervention to assess the knowledge of intensive care nurses about pressure injury. Rev Rene Revista de Rede de Enfermagen do Nordeste, 20, e41359. https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.20192041359

Arizona Department of Health Services (2009a). Diabetes. Arizona Diabetes Coalition. Retrieved July 5, 2022, from https://www.azdhs.gov/documents/prevention/tobacco-chronic-disease/diabetes/diabetes-fact-sheet.pdf

Arizona Department of Health Services (2009b). Facts and figures: Statistics on hospital-based care in Arizona 2004 – 2006. AZDHS. https://www.azdhs.gov/documents/preparedness/public-health-statistics/cancer-registry/hospital-based-care-az-2004-2006.pdf

Aydin, A.K., Karadag, A., Gül, S., Avsar, P., and Baykara, Z.G. (2019). Nurses’ knowledge and practices related to pressure injury: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nurses, 46(2), 117-123. https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000517

Bakar, N., Shohor, N.A., Latif, R.A., Munirah, S., Wahab, A., Zaki, M.A.A., and Kasim, M.M. (2022). The effects of SSKIN care bundle on nurses’ practice in prevention of pressure ulcer. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(7), 958-968. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i7/14325

Bal, D. (2022, December 22). What are Magnet hospitals? (And why it matters for nurses). Nurse Journal. https://nursejournal.org/resources/what-are-magnet-hospitals

Barakat-Johnson, M., Barnett, C., Wand, T., and White K. (2018). Knowledge and attitudes of nurses toward pressure injury prevention: A cross-sectional multisite study. Journal of Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nursing, 45(3), 233-237. https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000430

Description

Assess pressure injury knowledge of nursing staff on a single orthopedic surgical unit at the target hospital and provide learning opportunity based on areas of knowledge deficit. Determine if rates of hospital acquired pressure injuries change after focused educational intervention.

Author Details

Maria T. Gonzales, MSN, RN, CWCN, CCRN - Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA

Tammy Tyree, DNP, RN, ACNP-BC, CCRN, CNRN - Edson School of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA

Kari Johnson, PhD, RN, ACNS-BC, Hartford Scholar - Longevity Institute, HonorHealth, Scottsdale, AZ, USA

Crystelle Johnson, BSN, RN, CWOCN - HonorHealth Thompson Peak Wound Clinic, HonorHealth, Scottsdale, AZ, USA

Sigma Membership

Non-member

Type

Presentation

Format Type

Text-based Document

Study Design/Type

Other

Research Approach

Other

Keywords:

Hospital Acquired Pressure Injury, HAPI, Pressure Ulcer, Aged, Nursing Knowledge -- Evaluation

Conference Name

Creating Healthy Work Environments

Conference Host

Sigma Theta Tau International

Conference Location

Washington, DC, USA

Conference Year

2024

Rights Holder

All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record. All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository. All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.

Review Type

Abstract Review Only: Reviewed by Event Host

Acquisition

Proxy-submission

Date of Issue

2026-02-13

Click on the above link to access the slide deck.

Share

COinS
 

Pressure Injury Prevention and Education

Washington, DC, USA

Background: Increased age is a significant risk factor for hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPI) due to increased morbidities, decreased mobility, reduced nutrition, sensory impairments, reduced circulation, incontinence, and decreased immunity.

Purpose: Determine if focused education related to the Braden Scale (BS), pressure injuries (PI), and pressure injury prevention (PIP) will increase bedside staff knowledge of PI prevention and decrease HAPI incidence over three months.

Method: Pre/post-test design - Pre-intervention questionnaire, Educational Intervention, and Post-intervention questionnaire

Setting: 28-bed Orthopedic-Spinal Surgical Unit

Sample: Up to 38 nurses (RNs), four nursing supervisors, one director, and 14 patient care technicians (PCTs). Inclusion criteria: All full-time/part-time RNs, PCTs, supervisors, and the unit director working on an ortho-surgical unit who can read and write English and agree to participate. Patient sample includes any patients who experience a HAPI during the pre-intervention (3-month period) and post-intervention comparison 3-month period.

Instruments: Pressure Injury Knowledge Assessment Tool (PUKAT 2.0) to assess staff knowledge of PIs. Demographic questionnaire including age, gender, ethnicity, role, years of experience, and education level. A post-assessment questionnaire included an open-ended qualitative survey asking respondents to provide feedback about the educational intervention.

Intervention: Two weeks after completion of the pre-PUKAT 2.0, we delivered focused education based on the results of the pre-PUKAT via a rolling education cart, along with an illustrated informative PI booklet. Education was provided twice daily to reach the day and night shift staff. Two weeks post-educational intervention, the same PUKAT 2.0 was delivered to determine if staff education improved PI knowledge. HAPI incidence was also measured pre and post-intervention to assess for patient impact.

Data Analysis: Pre/post-knowledge assessment tests were analyzed using paired samples t-test. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze demographic data. HAPI incidence on the target unit will be compared in the same date ranges pre/post-educational intervention – 10/1/22 – 12/31/22 compared with 10/1/23 – 12/31/23.