Abstract

Background: Acute care comprises a significant amount of health care, with over 35 million hospitalizations in the United States annually.1 As the population ages and comorbidities and chronic illness increase, demand for hospital care is forecasted to grow.2 To meet the demand for acute care, clinicians, healthcare organizations, and policymakers are calling for increased nurse practitioner (NP) utilization in hospital care.3,4

Significance: Acute care NPs practice across clinical specialties and assume diverse roles providing high-quality, interdisciplinary hospital care.3,5,6 Despite demand for NPs in hospital care, barriers, including organizational regulations and state scope-of-practice restrictions, limit full implementation of their roles.7-9 These restrictions constrain the effectiveness of NPs by decreasing their capacity to contribute to care, fueling access to care problems, and increasing the cost of care.10

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine changes in the acute care NP work environment in the decade after formalizing the role in nursing policy.11

Methods: Using a repeated cross-sectional design and data from the National Sample Survey of Nurse Practitioners (2012) and the National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses (2018, 2022), the analysis included NPs certified in pediatric or adult acute care NP roles. Examining work environment characteristics measured in all three surveys, we perform descriptive statistics to summarize data distributions and trends. All analyses accounted for the complex survey design and weighting used to generate national workforce estimates.

Results: The majority (≥85%) of acute care NPs were satisfied with their jobs. However, there were gaps in the full attainment of acute care NP role implementation. Despite working in hospitals, less than one-third of acute care NPs had hospital admitting privileges or managed their own panel of patients. Only three out of five acute care NPs billed for their care. Some report they were not fully practicing to their scope (11.3-18.9%), and their skills were not fully utilized (11.7-23.3%).

Implications: Acute care NPs identified persistent opportunities to improve the work environment and remove practice restrictions that constrain their effectiveness. Future work should include advocacy to remove practice barriers and evaluation of policy interventions intended to improve the work environment of acute care NPs and meet the growing demand for care.

Notes

Reference list included in attached poster file.

Description

Despite demand for acute care nurse practitioners, barriers limit role implementation. This study used national survey data to examine changes in the acute care nurse practitioner work environment over the last decade. Participants can expect to learn about the persistent barriers in the work environment of acute care nurse practitioners. Further, they will understand what policy changes can most effectively remove practice barriers that constrain the effectiveness of these nurse practitioners.

Author Details

Kristin Hittle Gigli, PhD, RN, CPNP-AC

Sigma Membership

Iota at-Large, Delta Theta

Type

Poster

Format Type

Text-based Document

Study Design/Type

Cross-Sectional

Research Approach

Quantitative Research

Keywords:

Acute Care, Workforce, Workforce Planning and Development, Leadership, Nurse Practitioners

Conference Name

48th Biennial Convention

Conference Host

Sigma Theta Tau International

Conference Location

Indianapolis, Indiana, USA

Conference Year

2025

Rights Holder

All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record. All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository. All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.

Review Type

Abstract Review Only: Reviewed by Event Host

Acquisition

Proxy-submission

Date of Issue

2025-11-19

Click on the above link to access the poster.

Share

COinS
 

Characteristics of the United States Acute Care Nurse Practitioners’ Work Environment, 2012 to 2022

Indianapolis, Indiana, USA

Background: Acute care comprises a significant amount of health care, with over 35 million hospitalizations in the United States annually.1 As the population ages and comorbidities and chronic illness increase, demand for hospital care is forecasted to grow.2 To meet the demand for acute care, clinicians, healthcare organizations, and policymakers are calling for increased nurse practitioner (NP) utilization in hospital care.3,4

Significance: Acute care NPs practice across clinical specialties and assume diverse roles providing high-quality, interdisciplinary hospital care.3,5,6 Despite demand for NPs in hospital care, barriers, including organizational regulations and state scope-of-practice restrictions, limit full implementation of their roles.7-9 These restrictions constrain the effectiveness of NPs by decreasing their capacity to contribute to care, fueling access to care problems, and increasing the cost of care.10

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine changes in the acute care NP work environment in the decade after formalizing the role in nursing policy.11

Methods: Using a repeated cross-sectional design and data from the National Sample Survey of Nurse Practitioners (2012) and the National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses (2018, 2022), the analysis included NPs certified in pediatric or adult acute care NP roles. Examining work environment characteristics measured in all three surveys, we perform descriptive statistics to summarize data distributions and trends. All analyses accounted for the complex survey design and weighting used to generate national workforce estimates.

Results: The majority (≥85%) of acute care NPs were satisfied with their jobs. However, there were gaps in the full attainment of acute care NP role implementation. Despite working in hospitals, less than one-third of acute care NPs had hospital admitting privileges or managed their own panel of patients. Only three out of five acute care NPs billed for their care. Some report they were not fully practicing to their scope (11.3-18.9%), and their skills were not fully utilized (11.7-23.3%).

Implications: Acute care NPs identified persistent opportunities to improve the work environment and remove practice restrictions that constrain their effectiveness. Future work should include advocacy to remove practice barriers and evaluation of policy interventions intended to improve the work environment of acute care NPs and meet the growing demand for care.