Other Titles

Non-Pharmacological Interventions on Depression and Anxiety in Children and Adolescents: Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials [Poster Title]

Abstract

Objectives: Research has shown that non-pharmacological interventions can effectively reduce anxiety and depression in children and adolescents; however, there remains a lack of agreement on this topic. This review aims to assess the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs) in alleviating depression and anxiety in children and adolescents when compared to control groups.

Methods: A comprehensive search of electronic databases, including PubMed, PsycINFO, OVID, ProQuest, EBSCO host, and Cochrane, was conducted for studies published from 2009 to May 2023. Studies that employed non-pharmacological interventions to evaluate their impact on anxiety and depression in children and adolescents were included.

Results: Out of 3,680 study records screened, 15 studies (32 arms, 6,851 participants) met the inclusion criteria for the final analysis. The pooled analysis indicated a statistically significant difference between NPIs and control groups regarding depression (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.15, 95% CI -0.27, -0.03; p=0.01, I2=74%) and anxiety (SMD -0.48, 95% CI -0.76, -0.20; p=0.0007, I2=77%). Subgroup analyses showed a significant difference in depression outcomes for adolescents, while NPIs notably improved anxiety in children. However, NPIs did not yield significant improvements in depression among children.

Conclusions: This review underscores the positive impact of NPIs on reducing anxiety and depression in adolescents and children. Future research on NPI interventions should focus on long-term effects and well-structured methodologies to establish definitive conclusions regarding depression in children. Clinicians and practitioners should interpret these findings with caution, considering the methodological limitations present in the studies.

Study registration: The proposal has been registered with The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO 2023) CRD42023390189.

Notes

References:

1. Barry MM, Clarke AM, Jenkins R, Patel V. A systematic review of the effectiveness of mental health promotion interventions for young people in low and middle income countries. BMC Public Health 2013;13(1):835.

2. Bor W, Dean AJ, Najman J, Hayatbakhsh R. Are child and adolescent mental health problems increasing in the 21st century? A systematic review. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2014;48(7):606–16.

3. James AC, Reardon T, Soler A, James G, Creswell C. Cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020;2020(11):CD013162.

4. Lund C, Brooke-Sumner C, Baingana F, Baron EC, Breuer E, Chandra P, et al. Social determinants of mental disorders and the Sustainable Development Goals: a systematic review of reviews. The Lancet Psychiatry 2018;5(4):357–69.

5. Merikangas KR, Nakamura EF, Kessler RC. Epidemiology of mental disorders in children and adolescents. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2009;11(1):7–20.

6. James-Palmer A, Anderson EZ, Zucker L, Kofman Y, Daneault JF. Yoga as an Intervention for the Reduction of Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review. Front. Pediatr.2020;8:78.

7. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders [Internet]. 5th ed., t. 2022. Available from: https://dsm.psychiatryonline.org/doi/book/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787

Description

This meta-analysis demonstrates that using NPIs is beneficial, purportedly with lesser side effects and more cost-effectiveness in children and adolescents. Further, large-scale RCTs with more homogenous, uniform, and standardized NPIs are needed to study their long-term impact.

Author Details

Rajesh Kumar, PhD N, Post Doc (Johns Hopkins (USA); Maya Sahu, PhD MSC BSC N; Kalpana Beniwal, BSN, MBA (HA), Yogesh Bahurupi [credentials not supplied]; Anindya Das [credentials not supplied]

Sigma Membership

Chi Delta

Type

Poster

Format Type

Text-based Document

Study Design/Type

Meta-Analysis/Synthesis

Research Approach

Quantitative Research

Keywords:

Public and Community Health, Policy and Advocacy, Non-pharmacological Interventions, Anxiety, Depression, Children and Adolescents

Conference Name

36th International Nursing Research Congress

Conference Host

Sigma Theta Tau International

Conference Location

Seattle, Washington, USA

Conference Year

2025

Rights Holder

All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.

Review Type

Abstract Review Only: Reviewed by Event Host

Acquisition

Proxy-submission

Click on the above link to access the poster.

Share

COinS
 

Effect of Non-Pharmacological Interventions in Depression and Anxiety in Children and Adolescents MA

Seattle, Washington, USA

Objectives: Research has shown that non-pharmacological interventions can effectively reduce anxiety and depression in children and adolescents; however, there remains a lack of agreement on this topic. This review aims to assess the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs) in alleviating depression and anxiety in children and adolescents when compared to control groups.

Methods: A comprehensive search of electronic databases, including PubMed, PsycINFO, OVID, ProQuest, EBSCO host, and Cochrane, was conducted for studies published from 2009 to May 2023. Studies that employed non-pharmacological interventions to evaluate their impact on anxiety and depression in children and adolescents were included.

Results: Out of 3,680 study records screened, 15 studies (32 arms, 6,851 participants) met the inclusion criteria for the final analysis. The pooled analysis indicated a statistically significant difference between NPIs and control groups regarding depression (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.15, 95% CI -0.27, -0.03; p=0.01, I2=74%) and anxiety (SMD -0.48, 95% CI -0.76, -0.20; p=0.0007, I2=77%). Subgroup analyses showed a significant difference in depression outcomes for adolescents, while NPIs notably improved anxiety in children. However, NPIs did not yield significant improvements in depression among children.

Conclusions: This review underscores the positive impact of NPIs on reducing anxiety and depression in adolescents and children. Future research on NPI interventions should focus on long-term effects and well-structured methodologies to establish definitive conclusions regarding depression in children. Clinicians and practitioners should interpret these findings with caution, considering the methodological limitations present in the studies.

Study registration: The proposal has been registered with The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO 2023) CRD42023390189.