Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess knowledge and attitudes of doctors, nurses and nursing technicians regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) before and after simulation-based learning (SBL).

Background: The Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) is a vital component of the chain of survival for people who undergo cardiac arrest. The global incidences of cardiac arrest have increased over the past years (Lim et al., 2020). Subsequently, the incidences of cardiac arrest in the lower middle-income countries are higher with alarmingly poorer survival rates (Ahmed et al., 2021). This imposes greater responsibility on the healthcare system to respond to the cardiac arrest situations with utmost preparedness. Most of the cardiac arrests happening within-hospital are first encountered by doctors, nurses or paramedical staffs most of the time. The efficiency, skill and timeliness to begin CPR for these frontliners is directly associated with the positive health outcomes for the patients (Dedeilia et al., 2020). To inform the healthcare delivery system and identify areas that require further development, it is crucial to assess the knowledge and attitudes of healthcare providers regarding CPR.

Methodology: The study used the quasi-experimental pre-test and post-test design. The doctors, nurses and nursing technicians from the medicine ward of a tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan, were recruited based on total sampling method whereby 99 frontline healthcare providers took part. The data was collected using two previously validated tools: Basic Resuscitation Skills Self-Efficacy Scale (BRS-SES) for attitude assessment (Hernández-Padilla et al., 2014) and a 15-item knowledge-based questionnaire (Iqbal et al., 2021).

Results: The study affirmed that baseline knowledge and attitudes of healthcare providers were poor. The preset knowledge of healthcare providers was insufficient (6.44 ± 3.22) and increased significantly (13.82 ± 2.03) post-simulation. Similarly, the attitude pretest scores were suggestive of unsatisfactory results (43.94 ± 20.2), which surpassed with (91.95 ± 8.2) significantly improved scores on the post-test.

Notes

References:

Lim, Z. J., Reddy, M. P., Afroz, A., Billah, B., Shekar, K., & Subramaniam, A. (2020). Incidence and outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in the COVID-19 era: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation, 157, 248-258.

Ahmed, F., Abbasi, L., Ghouri, N., & Patel, M. J. (2021). Epidemiology of in-hospital cardiac arrest in a Pakistani tertiary care hospital pre- and during COVID-19 pandemic. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 38(ICON-2022). https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.38.icon-2022.5776

Dedeilia, A., Sotiropoulos, M. G., Hanrahan, J., Janga, D., Dedeilias, P., & Sideris, M. (2020b). Medical and Surgical Education Challenges and Innovations in the COVID-19 Era: A Systematic review. In Vivo, 34(3 suppl), 1603–1611. https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.11950

Hernández-Padilla, J., Suthers, F., Fernández-Sola, C., & Granero-Molina, J. (2016). Development and psychometric assessment of the Basic Resuscitation Skills Self-Efficacy Scale. European journal of cardiovascular nursing, 15(3), e10–e18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474515114562130

Iqbal, A., Nisar, I., Arshad, I., Butt, U. I., Umar, M., Ayyaz, M., & Farooka, M. W. (2021). Cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Knowledge and Attitude of doctors from Lahore. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102600

Description

The study has explicitly shown that educational interventions such as simulation-based learning can improve knowledge and attitudes of healthcare providers regarding CPR skills. However, further studies are required to determine the retention of core medical concepts and their application into real clinical settings.

Author Details

Nausheen Barkat Ali Noorani, MSN

Sigma Membership

Non-member

Type

Presentation

Format Type

Text-based Document

Study Design/Type

Quasi-Experimental Study, Other

Research Approach

Quantitative Research

Keywords:

Simulation, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, CPR, Cardiac Arrests

Conference Name

36th International Nursing Research Congress

Conference Host

Sigma Theta Tau International

Conference Location

Seattle, Washington, USA

Conference Year

2025

Rights Holder

All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.

Review Type

Abstract Review Only: Reviewed by Event Host

Acquisition

Proxy-submission

Click on the above link to access the slide deck.

Share

COinS
 

Using Simulation to Assess Knowledge and Attitudes of Healthcare Providers Regarding CPR

Seattle, Washington, USA

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess knowledge and attitudes of doctors, nurses and nursing technicians regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) before and after simulation-based learning (SBL).

Background: The Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) is a vital component of the chain of survival for people who undergo cardiac arrest. The global incidences of cardiac arrest have increased over the past years (Lim et al., 2020). Subsequently, the incidences of cardiac arrest in the lower middle-income countries are higher with alarmingly poorer survival rates (Ahmed et al., 2021). This imposes greater responsibility on the healthcare system to respond to the cardiac arrest situations with utmost preparedness. Most of the cardiac arrests happening within-hospital are first encountered by doctors, nurses or paramedical staffs most of the time. The efficiency, skill and timeliness to begin CPR for these frontliners is directly associated with the positive health outcomes for the patients (Dedeilia et al., 2020). To inform the healthcare delivery system and identify areas that require further development, it is crucial to assess the knowledge and attitudes of healthcare providers regarding CPR.

Methodology: The study used the quasi-experimental pre-test and post-test design. The doctors, nurses and nursing technicians from the medicine ward of a tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan, were recruited based on total sampling method whereby 99 frontline healthcare providers took part. The data was collected using two previously validated tools: Basic Resuscitation Skills Self-Efficacy Scale (BRS-SES) for attitude assessment (Hernández-Padilla et al., 2014) and a 15-item knowledge-based questionnaire (Iqbal et al., 2021).

Results: The study affirmed that baseline knowledge and attitudes of healthcare providers were poor. The preset knowledge of healthcare providers was insufficient (6.44 ± 3.22) and increased significantly (13.82 ± 2.03) post-simulation. Similarly, the attitude pretest scores were suggestive of unsatisfactory results (43.94 ± 20.2), which surpassed with (91.95 ± 8.2) significantly improved scores on the post-test.