Abstract

Purpose/Background/Significance: Undergraduate nursing honors research programs are a method for increasing the desire for students to pursue graduate education for eventual research careers. The purpose of this study was to identify and describe the types and outcomes of undergraduate nursing honors research programs in the U.S.

Methods: A qualitative descriptive design using content analysis for data analysis. Faculty who were involved in undergraduate nursing honors research programs in the U.S. were recruited to complete an interview that elicited responses on the type and structure of the program, barriers to implementation, faculty workload models, and outcomes realized from the program.

Results: There is variance in the methods for the design and execution of undergraduate nursing honors research programs. Variance is primarily seen in the following areas: linkage to a university or campus level honors/research program; specific required coursework; when in the nursing program the honors program commences; who is selecting the honors topic; the student final outcome; faculty eligibility to direct honors students; how faculty workload is managed; and how mentoring honors students contributes to the promotion and/or tenure process. Less variability is found with the following areas: admissions criteria; major barrier to execution of program is faculty availability; and desiring program outcomes of graduate school and project dissemination. Despite the variation, the many types of models of undergraduate nursing honors research program were deemed successful by participants related to the main purpose of the programs which is to develop future nursing scholars. This study is limited to the findings of the participants programs.

Conclusions: This study found that while there is variance in the design and execution of undergraduate nursing honors research programs, that this variance does not limit the outcomes of the program.

Notes

References:

American Council on Education (2023). The Carnegie classification of institutions of higher education. Retrieved from: https://carnegieclassifications.acenet.edu/index.php

Bull, R., Shearer, T., Youl, L, & Campbell, S. (2018). Enhancing graduate nurse transition: report of the evaluation of the clinical honors program. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 49(8), 348-355. doi:10.3928/00220124-20180718-05

Burkhalter, P. K., Kim, H. T., (1976). The honors program approach to undergraduate research in nursing. Journal of Nursing Education, 15(5), 21-25.

Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652-661. DOI: 10.1177/1744987120927206 journals.sagepub.com/home/jrn

Duckett, L. J., Brand, K. P., Fairbanks, D. (1990). Recruiting the brightest and best for nursing—an honors program can help. Nurse Educator, 15(1), 12-16.

Halcomb, E. J., Smyth, E. A., Moxham, L., Tranor, V., & Fernandez, R. S. (2018). Bachelor of nursing honours program in Australia: current trends and key challenges. Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health – Papers, Part A. 5263. https://ro.uow.edu.au/smhpapers/5263

Hermanns, M., Smith, B. M., Stone, K., & Streufert, P. D. (2022). Engaging nursing honors students in research: a model program. Journal of Professional Nursing, 43(2022), 129-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2022.10.002

Hewes, C., & Schmidt, K. (2000). A model for the future: integration of the bachelor of nursing honours degree with the graduate nurse program. Collegian, 7(2), 10-13.

Kim, H, Sefcik, J. S., & Bradway, C. (2017). Characteristics of qualitative descriptive studies: a systematic review. Research Nursing & Health, 40(1), 23-43. doi:10.1002/nur.21768.

Kuckartz, U. (2019). Qualitative text analysis: a systematic approach. In Compenium for early career researchers in mathematics education (G. Kaiser & N. Presmeg, Eds). Springer Open. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15636-7

Lim, F., Nelson, N., Stimpfel, A. W., Navarra, A. M., & Slater, L. Z. (2016). Honors programs: current perspectives for implementation. Nurse Educator, 41(2), 98-102. DOI: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000211

Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2021). The future of nursing 2020-2030: charting a path to achieve health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/2e982.

Neuberger, G. B. (2016). Developing PhD nurse scientists: do bachelor of science in nursing honors programs help? Journal of Nursing Education, 55(10), 579-582.
doi:10.3928/01484834-20160914-07

Oleson, M. (1988). To be or not to be: honors program in baccalaureate nursing education. Nurse Educator, 13(4), 26-29.

Redley, B., Forbes, H., Bloomer, M., Tomlinson, E., Manias, E., & Botti, M. (2021). Towards nursing leadership for professional and career outcomes of bachelor of nursing (honours) students: a case study. Collegian, 28(2021), 692-702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2021.07.008

Reutter, L., Paul, P., Sales, A., Jerke, H., Lee, A., McColl, M., Stafford, E., Visram, A. (2010). Incorporating a research apprenticeship model in a Canadian nursing honors program. Nurse Education Today, 30(2010), 562-567. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2009.12.001

Schepp, C., Brown, R. J., Bott-Knutson, R. C. (2021). Honors and nursing: reasons for enrollment, persistence, and withdrawal. Journal for Nursing Education, 60(6), 333-336. doi:10.3928/01484834-20210520-06

Description

Undergraduate nursing honors research programs are a method for increasing the desire for students to pursue graduate education for eventual research careers. The purpose of this study was to identify and describe the types and outcomes of undergraduate nursing honors research programs in the U.S. This study found that while there is variance in the design and execution of undergraduate nursing honors research programs, that this variance does not limit the outcomes of the program.

Author Details

Deanna L. Reising, PhD, RN, ACNS-BC, FAAN, FNAP, ANEF and Jessie Cheziwa, BSN, RN

Sigma Membership

Alpha

Type

Presentation

Format Type

Text-based Document

Study Design/Type

Descriptive/Correlational

Research Approach

Qualitative Research

Keywords:

Mentoring and Coaching, Curriculum Development, Nursing Education, Advances in Education, Nursing Research, Undergraduate Nursing Students, Honors Programs

Conference Name

48th Biennial Convention

Conference Host

Sigma Theta Tau International

Conference Location

Indianapolis, Indiana, USA

Conference Year

2025

Rights Holder

All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record. All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository. All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.

Review Type

Abstract Review Only: Reviewed by Event Host

Acquisition

Proxy-submission

Date of Issue

2025-12-02

Click on the above link to access the slide deck.

Share

COinS
 

Current Practices in Undergraduate Nursing Honors Research Programs

Indianapolis, Indiana, USA

Purpose/Background/Significance: Undergraduate nursing honors research programs are a method for increasing the desire for students to pursue graduate education for eventual research careers. The purpose of this study was to identify and describe the types and outcomes of undergraduate nursing honors research programs in the U.S.

Methods: A qualitative descriptive design using content analysis for data analysis. Faculty who were involved in undergraduate nursing honors research programs in the U.S. were recruited to complete an interview that elicited responses on the type and structure of the program, barriers to implementation, faculty workload models, and outcomes realized from the program.

Results: There is variance in the methods for the design and execution of undergraduate nursing honors research programs. Variance is primarily seen in the following areas: linkage to a university or campus level honors/research program; specific required coursework; when in the nursing program the honors program commences; who is selecting the honors topic; the student final outcome; faculty eligibility to direct honors students; how faculty workload is managed; and how mentoring honors students contributes to the promotion and/or tenure process. Less variability is found with the following areas: admissions criteria; major barrier to execution of program is faculty availability; and desiring program outcomes of graduate school and project dissemination. Despite the variation, the many types of models of undergraduate nursing honors research program were deemed successful by participants related to the main purpose of the programs which is to develop future nursing scholars. This study is limited to the findings of the participants programs.

Conclusions: This study found that while there is variance in the design and execution of undergraduate nursing honors research programs, that this variance does not limit the outcomes of the program.