Abstract

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) offers immediate clinical insight, but turning exposure into everyday practice requires more than a single course. Over four years of APP-led, interprofessional training (2021-2025), we used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to understand what helped, what hindered, and what our participants needed. Findings came directly from post-course and follow-up surveys.

Facilitators. Learners consistently described progress when teaching matched how ultrasound is actually used at the bedside. Shared language, step-by-step scanning, and reviewing real cases helped them connect image acquisition to clinical decisions. Psychological safety was another major driver. Being able to ask questions, try, fail, and try again mattered—especially for novices. Small instructor-to-learner ratios gave people room to scan, get direct feedback, and build confidence. Many also emphasized how institutional support shaped their experience: having access to devices, encouragement from colleagues and supervisors, and opportunities to practice on their units made it far more likely they would continue scanning.

Barriers. Despite skill gains, participants often felt blocked by structure rather than motivation. Limited equipment, lack of confidence, and absence of credentialing or quality assurance caused hesitancy in practicing, let alone applying POCUS in clinical settings. A single course level also did not fit everyone. Newer operators wanted more fundamentals, while experienced participants pushed for advanced echocardiography or procedure-based content. Additionally, when ratios exceeded 1:5, hands-on practice dropped, feedback slowed, and confidence dipped. Moreover, some cited a lack of time and inconsistent access to patients as additional barriers to developing or maintaining POCUS skills.

Lessons learned. The surveys made one point clear: interest alone does not make ultrasound part of practice. Sustainable use requires systems that match the realities of clinical work. That means tiered training, reliable ultrasound access, ongoing practice opportunities, clear expectations for competency, and pathways for credentialing and quality assurance. When those elements are in place, APP-led curricula can broaden access to POCUS skills, support interprofessional learning, and help teams integrate ultrasound safely and meaningfully into patient care.

Notes

References:

Breimaier, H. E., Heckemann, B., Halfens, R. J. G., & Lohrmann, C. (2015). The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR): a useful theoretical framework for guiding and evaluating a guideline implementation process in a hospital-based nursing practice. BMC Nursing, 14(1), Article 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-015-0088-4

Chelikam, N., Vyas, A., Desai, R., Khan, N., Raol, K., Kavarthapu, A., Kamani, P., Ibrahim, G., Madireddy, S., Pothuru, S., Shah, P., & Patel, U. K. (2023). Past and Present of Point-of-Care Ultrasound (PoCUS): A Narrative Review. Cureus, 15(12), e50155. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.50155

Chen, L. L., Tayban, K., Tomicich, J., Buchholz, T., Barzola, M., Mead, E., & Halpern, N. A. (2023). Point-of-care Ultrasound (POCUS) Program for Critical Care Nurse Practitioners and Physician Assistants in an Oncological Intensive Care Unit and Rapid Response Team. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 10.1097/JXX.0000000000000943. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1097/JXX.0000000000000943

Damschroder, L. J., Reardon, C. M., Widerquist, M. A. O., & Lowery, J. (2022). The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback. Implementation Science : IS, 17(1), Article 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0

Elhassan, M. G., Grewal, S., & Nezarat, N. (2023). Point-of-Care Ultrasonography in Internal Medicine: Limitations and Pitfalls for Novice Users. Cureus, 15(8), e43655. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.43655

Fischer, F., Lange, K., Klose, K., Greiner, W., & Kraemer, A. (2016). Barriers and Strategies in Guideline Implementation—A Scoping Review. Healthcare (Basel), 4(3), 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare4030036

Oto, B., Baeten, R., Chen, L., Dalal, P., Dancel, R., Fox, S., Lange Iv, C. W., Baston, C., Bornemann, P., Dugar, S., Goldsmith, A., Herbst, M. K., Kirkpatrick, J. N., Koratala, A., Lanspa, M. J., Lobo, V., Nomura, J. T., Pustavoitau, A., Senussi, M. H., Sorrell, V. L., … Sarwal, A. (2024). Best Practices for Point of Care Ultrasound: An Interdisciplinary Expert Consensus. POCUS journal, 9(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.24908/pocus.v9i1.17240

Prager, R., Wu, D., Garber, G., Finestone, P. J., Zang, C., Aslanova, R., & Arntfield, R. (2024). Medico-legal risks of point-of-care ultrasound: a closed-case analysis of Canadian Medical Protective Association medico-legal cases. The ultrasound journal, 16(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-024-00364-7

Description

Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), our APP-led POCUS curriculum identified key factors shaping adoption. Small instructor ratios, case-based scanning, and psychological safety enabled skill growth. Barriers included mixed learner readiness, limited equipment access, and inconsistent support for novice operators. Sustainable integration requires tiered curricula, equipment, and quality assurance structures.

Author Details

Al-Zada "Al" Aguilar, DNP, ACNP-BC, NPD-BC, CNEcl, CCRN

Sigma Membership

Alpha Tau

Type

Presentation

Format Type

Text-based Document

Study Design/Type

Other

Research Approach

Mixed/Multi Method Research

Keywords:

Curriculum Development, Continuing Education, Teaching and Learning Strategies, Ultrasonic Imaging, Point-of-Care Testing, Mobile Learning

Conference Name

37th International Nursing Research Congress

Conference Host

Sigma Theta Tau International

Conference Location

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Conference Year

2026

Rights Holder

All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record. All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository. All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.

Review Type

Abstract Review Only: Reviewed by Event Host

Acquisition

Proxy-submission

Date of Issue

2026-09-30

Click above link to access the slide deck.

Share

COinS
 

APP Led-POCUS Education: Survey Findings on Barriers, Facilitators, and Adoption

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) offers immediate clinical insight, but turning exposure into everyday practice requires more than a single course. Over four years of APP-led, interprofessional training (2021-2025), we used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to understand what helped, what hindered, and what our participants needed. Findings came directly from post-course and follow-up surveys.

Facilitators. Learners consistently described progress when teaching matched how ultrasound is actually used at the bedside. Shared language, step-by-step scanning, and reviewing real cases helped them connect image acquisition to clinical decisions. Psychological safety was another major driver. Being able to ask questions, try, fail, and try again mattered—especially for novices. Small instructor-to-learner ratios gave people room to scan, get direct feedback, and build confidence. Many also emphasized how institutional support shaped their experience: having access to devices, encouragement from colleagues and supervisors, and opportunities to practice on their units made it far more likely they would continue scanning.

Barriers. Despite skill gains, participants often felt blocked by structure rather than motivation. Limited equipment, lack of confidence, and absence of credentialing or quality assurance caused hesitancy in practicing, let alone applying POCUS in clinical settings. A single course level also did not fit everyone. Newer operators wanted more fundamentals, while experienced participants pushed for advanced echocardiography or procedure-based content. Additionally, when ratios exceeded 1:5, hands-on practice dropped, feedback slowed, and confidence dipped. Moreover, some cited a lack of time and inconsistent access to patients as additional barriers to developing or maintaining POCUS skills.

Lessons learned. The surveys made one point clear: interest alone does not make ultrasound part of practice. Sustainable use requires systems that match the realities of clinical work. That means tiered training, reliable ultrasound access, ongoing practice opportunities, clear expectations for competency, and pathways for credentialing and quality assurance. When those elements are in place, APP-led curricula can broaden access to POCUS skills, support interprofessional learning, and help teams integrate ultrasound safely and meaningfully into patient care.